A person convicted of perjury under federal law may face up to five years in prison and fines.
The Democrats that assisted and presented her story as True and said they believed her are also Guilty also their actions trashed Due Process and the Presumption of Innocence.
Section 1621 covers general perjury and stipulates that anyone who “willfully and contrary to such oath states or subscribes any material matter which he does not believe to be true” is guilty of perjury and shall be fined or imprisoned up to five years, or both
She started out with a lie that Standford has tried to cover up for her. Chadwick More reported at Dangerous in RECORDS SHOW DR. FORD IS NOT A LICENSED PSYCHOLOGIST, MAY HAVE COMMITTED PERJURY
“Testifying under oath before the Senate Judiciary Committee, Christine Blasey Ford identified herself as a ‘psychologist,’ but records indict this is a false statement under California law. Someone at Stanford University also appears to have caught the blunder and edited Ford’s faculty page.
Just one sentence into her sworn testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee regarding allegations of sexual assault against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, Dr. Christine Blasey Ford may have told a lie.”
We Have also put together another video of other lies. When someone lies they try to sell it with clever little sayings and smiles. You do not do this telling the truth. You do not have to look down at notes when you stand on the truth. You do not need Attorney’s and evidence like “I have 2 front doors” so he did it!!
The Democrats have made a mockery of our Senate and have no shame in doing so. They now want to Look into perjury charges on Judge Kavanaugh!
Dangerous continues “What makes Ford’s claim even more suspicious is someone affiliated with Stanford University appears to have also been aware of the potentially damning use of the word “psychologist” and rushed to cover for Ford. DANGEROUS exclusively uncovered an archived version of Ford’s page on the school’s faculty directory. On September 10, 2015, the only archived date available, Ford’s faculty page was saved to the Wayback Machine and showed Ford listed as a “research psychologist” along with her email address and office phone number.”
This is how it appears now:
“It is common for academics and researchers in psychology to not hold a license. California law does not prohibit anyone from engaging in research, teaching, or other activities associated with psychology if they are not licensed, so long as those individuals do not use the word “psychologist” when referring to themselves publicly.”
She is not nor never has been a Psychologist:
Psychologists typically have one of two degrees (PsyD or PhD). The PhD prepares a psychologist to conduct scientific research for a career in academia.
PhD programs can prepare students to be licensed psychologists, and training in these types of programs prepares graduates to take state licensing exams.
Just graduating does not make you a Psychologist!!
A search of the state-run Database of all licensed Psychologists in California shows she is not a licensed Psychologists. Why is this important? To call oneself a psychologist without being licensed by a state board is the equivalent of a law school graduate calling herself a lawyer without ever taking the bar exam.
If you lie unnecessarily to sell yourself as more credible in the first 10 seconds of your testimony you are purposely deceiving. Will the media touch on this? Please, share!!~RJH